
Deviating a bit from my quest to read the top 100 novels, I started reading Eragon by Christopher Paolini. (I borrowed the one with the movie cover one from the library.)
This allowed me a relapse into the fantasy genre which I have been reading almost exclusively since I was gifted a Raymond E Feist at Christmas one year. Blame the parents.
I do not tend to read dragon related fantasies however, I have always thought they were a bit too cliché. The only books I have close to this are the first Robin Hobb (Her Farseer and Liveship Traders are probably the best fantasy series I have read) books which portray dragons quite differently and in fact barely mentions them even though they for a pivotal aspect of the trilogys.
I decided to make an exception with Eragon. Afterall a book that has been turned into a movie must deserve a read. (I would like to point out I have not seen the movie Eragon yet.) One of the greatest fantasy epics - The Lord of the Rings has also had that unfortunate honour. I just don't believe you can bring books to life via movies. Imagination is very powerful and everybody's is different. But I will admit that sometimes there are a good turn of events to this. I read the Da Vinci code by Dan Brown because everybody was talking about the movie and that is an excellent book.
But I digress...
Eragon has all the makings of the classic dragon fantasy. Boy meets dragon/finds dragon's egg. Dragon becomes friend with boy and is magical (obviously). Boy goes on adventure with dragon Boy becomes a hero because of dragon etc. etc.
Paolini writes like somebody who has grown up reading good fantasy and good descriptive texts but not good writing. His writing is very fragmented and rushed in my opinion. He writes like he is reading a good novel: the storyline is captivating but you want to get to the end as quickly as possible to find out what happens. He gets there that quickly and the whole effect is ruined. There is a reason why authors don't just take you to the crux of the story. You need character development, world-building, story building. You need your readers to build a good rapport with your world and characters before they can do so with your story line. You don't want them to have any incling of what is going to happen. This is especially important in regards to fantasy as some readers will take time to relate to and enjoy your world which is why epic fantasy works - Tolkien, Martin, Eddings, Feist and even Rowling.
It was not all bad. I liked the way Paolini took time to describe the majority of his characters even minor ones. Sometimes it is good to have the author's portrayal of the character rather than just your own. His storyline was ok though not anything 'new' and captivating. I expect his writing will mature as he does. I have no plans in reading Eldest and Brisingr anytime soon.
I am, howver, thankful that he and the movie are bringing more youngsters to what I believe is the original fictif genre.
In summary a good first effort. I expect a better class of writing in his following books.
Next up The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy , Pride and Prejudice.






